A new analysis reveals dramatic differences in average debt levels across Danish municipalities, with residents of Gentofte owing more than five times as much as those in Brøndby. However, experts say high debt doesn’t necessarily indicate financial trouble, as it often reflects property ownership in expensive areas where housing acts as wealth accumulation.
Geography Determines Debt Levels
Less than ten kilometers separate Brøndby from Gentofte in the greater Copenhagen area, yet their residents live in vastly different financial realities. According to a new study by comparison service MyBanker, the average adult in Gentofte carries debt exceeding 1.5 million Danish kroner, while Brøndby residents owe less than 300,000 kroner on average.
The analysis examined all 98 Danish municipalities and found stark contrasts in debt distribution nationwide. Surprisingly, these differences don’t reflect poor money management or excessive consumer borrowing. Instead, they tell a story about Denmark’s housing market and wealth inequality.
Housing Drives the Debt Equation
Jens Hjarsbech, chief economist at MyBanker and former analyst at Denmark’s National Bank and the European Central Bank, explains that the debt map primarily reflects property values and homeownership rates. Municipalities like Gentofte, Rudersdal, and Hørsholm top the debt rankings because housing prices there are exceptionally high.
When purchasing a property worth several million kroner, taking on substantial debt becomes virtually unavoidable. For those interested in understanding mortgage calculations, the connection between property values and borrowing becomes clear.
Debt Reflects Wealth Building
Rather than indicating financial distress, high debt levels often accompany wealth accumulation through property ownership. Home equity cannot develop without first owning property, which requires borrowing for most Danes.
As a result, the debt map shouldn’t be interpreted as showing where household finances struggle most. In fact, reading it somewhat in reverse makes more sense. Debt and wealth frequently go hand in hand, and homeowners can leverage their properties to build financial security over time.
Two Categories of Borrowing
Beyond examining total debt, the MyBanker analysis broke borrowing into two categories. The first consists of priority loans, mainly real estate mortgages and home loans. The second category functions as something of a catch-all, encompassing car loans, consumer credit, and bank loans associated with property purchases.
Gentofte Leads in All Categories
Even in the miscellaneous borrowing category, Gentofte residents average 227,000 kroner in debt, the highest nationwide. This likely stems from bank loans used for property purchase financing, specifically the additional borrowing beyond standard mortgage limits.
How Property Financing Works
Standard real estate loans in Denmark allow borrowing up to 80 percent of a property’s value through mortgage institutions that hold property liens. Buyers can borrow an additional 15 percent through banks without property collateral, often called afterfinancing or remaining financing. Finally, purchasers must provide at least five percent in down payment or self-financing.
While expensive car purchases might explain some debt in affluent areas, the data more likely reflects this supplementary property financing rather than luxury consumer habits.
Regional Disparities in Borrowing Patterns
Municipalities like Læsø, Brønderslev, and Jammerbugt rank high when examining non-mortgage debt as a percentage of total borrowing. In these areas where property values remain modest, the miscellaneous debt category represents between 20 and 33 percent of all debt.
Limited Home Equity Options
When property values stagnate or grow slowly, homeowners cannot build substantial equity to borrow against. Consequently, financing a vehicle or other major purchase requires taking out dedicated loans with higher interest rates compared to borrowing against home equity.
This pattern exposes an important reality about Denmark’s housing market. The nation doesn’t have one unified property market but rather two or three distinct markets. Some areas, particularly Copenhagen, Aarhus, and surrounding regions, experience rapid growth. Meanwhile, other regions see little price movement, preventing residents from using property ownership for wealth expansion or managing their finances through home equity.
Understanding the Wealth Gap
For those outside the property market in high-growth areas, frustration is understandable. When Copenhagen prices increase 20 percent annually, few other investment options can match that wealth-building potential.
At the same time, the economist acknowledges risks for those buying at market peaks. Property value declines create difficulties for highly leveraged homeowners. However, for residents in traditionally expensive municipalities like Gentofte, Rudersdal, or Hørsholm, long-term prospects remain relatively secure. Even when prices drop temporarily in these areas, recovery typically occurs quickly.
No Immediate Concerns
Despite high absolute debt levels, there’s no reason for alarm regarding financial stability in the most indebted municipalities. The combination of strong property markets, high incomes, and substantial home equity provides cushion against economic downturns.
Meanwhile, the analysis reveals deeper truths about economic opportunity and wealth distribution across Denmark. Property ownership in the right location has become a primary vehicle for financial advancement, creating growing divides between regions and between property owners and renters nationwide.
The Role of Property in Personal Finance
For most Danish households, real estate represents the largest financial decision of their lives. The MyBanker study demonstrates how dramatically geography influences not just debt levels but overall economic trajectories and wealth-building capacity.
In expensive municipalities, high debt accompanies property ownership that serves as both shelter and investment. In regions with stagnant property markets, residents may carry less mortgage debt but also miss opportunities for passive wealth accumulation through real estate appreciation.
This dynamic reinforces existing wealth inequalities and makes entering property markets in desirable areas increasingly difficult for younger generations and those without family financial support. The five-fold debt difference between Gentofte and Brøndby ultimately reflects much broader questions about economic opportunity, regional development, and the changing nature of wealth in contemporary Denmark.
Sources and References
The Danish Dream: Mortgage Calculator Denmark for Home Loan Management
The Danish Dream: Best Mortgage Loan in Denmark for Foreigners
TV2: Se kortet: Skylder du mere end dine naboer?
