Controversial Greenland Documentary Withdrawn Amid Criticism

In a dramatic turn of events, Danmarks Radio (DR) has decided to withdraw the controversial documentary ‘Greenland’s White Gold’ following intense scrutiny and criticism, particularly over potentially misleading economic claims. The editor-in-chief of DR News, Thomas Falbe, who was responsible for overseeing the production of the documentary, has stepped down effectively immediately.

Decision to Withdraw Documentary

Following more than a week of intense debate, DR, Denmark’s national broadcasting corporation, announced the withdrawal of the highly controversial documentary ‘Greenland’s White Gold.’ According to Sandy French, the news director at DR, she learned about a pivotal graphic that featured prominently in an earlier version of the documentary. This revelation is reported as the key factor that led to the decision to retract the documentary. The documentary has been controversial due to potentially misleading economic claims about Denmark’s economic gains of cryolite mining in Greenland. With the current global debates over Greenland as well as a national election in Greenland approaching, the documentary has been highly controversial.

Sandy French stated, “This issue, combined with the overall number of problems that have been acknowledged and regretted over the past days, is the reason I have now made this decision. I want to apologise for publishing a documentary that does not meet the expectations that the Danish public rightly has for us.”

Leadership Changes at DR

In the wake of the controversy, the leadership at DR is also experiencing upheaval. The editor-in-chief of DR News, Thomas Falbe, who was responsible for overseeing the production of the documentary, has stepped down effectively immediately. This resignation is part of DR’s broader effort to address the many issues that have arisen from the documentary’s broadcast and the resilience of public trust in the Danish media.

Key Controversy Over Economic Claims

The documentary initially aired on February 9 and has sparked heated debate ever since its release. It claimed that the Danish society has been enriched to the tune of roughly $400 billion (in today’s currency) through the extraction of cryolite in Greenland. This figure has raised numerous eyebrows, particularly in light of the ongoing discussion surrounding Greenland’s pursuit of independence.

Since the documentary’s airing, a torrent of criticism has emerged from various commentators, including individuals directly involved in the film. Notably, Professor Torben M. Andersen, who appeared in the documentary, refuted the claims as misleading and fraught with significant uncertainty. He emphasized that the statistic presented could not be supported by reliable evidence, reflecting a broader discontent among experts regarding the documentary’s handling of sensitive economic data.

Professor Carl-Johan Dalgaard, who served as a chief economist for the Economic Council, echoed these sentiments, labeling the computation as erroneous. Furthermore, Kjeld Møller Pedersen, a professor emeritus of economics, criticized the documentary for failing to adequately represent the complexity of the economic situation in Greenland.

As the outcry intensified, DR was compelled to make numerous amendments to its reporting associated with the documentary. These adjustments highlight the ongoing struggle for accurate and responsible journalism in the face of complex geopolitical issues.

Context of Greenland’s Political Landscape

The controversy surrounding ‘Greenland’s White Gold’ arrives amidst a critical political environment in Greenland, where independence discussions are increasingly persistent. As the Greenlandic election campaign heats up, the question of sovereignty and control over natural resources has taken center stage with national leader Mute B. Egede arguing for an independence vote. The documentary’s portrayal of Denmark’s economic relationship with Greenland thus resonates deeply within current political discourse.

The issues of self-determination and resource management are at the forefront of Greenlandic politics, making the documentary’s potentially misleading claims potentially damaging. Critics argue that such sensationalised figures can skew public opinion and influence political outcomes, particularly in a territory where many are advocating for greater autonomy and control over their future.

While the economic claims in the documentary have been deconstructed by experts, the broader discussion regarding Greenland’s resources, independence, and the historical context of its relationship with Denmark remains salient.

Steven Højlund

Writer

See Full Bio