The discussion surrounding Greenland’s independence should focus not only on past grievances but also on the concept of community that underpins the Union of the Realm. Minik Rosing, a dual citizen of Denmark and Greenland, stresses the importance of recognizing shared values and relationships as Greenland seeks its future.
Shifting Perspectives on Greenland’s Independence
The debate about Greenland’s independence has gained renewed vigor in recent times, particularly highlighted by the recent political landscape in the United States. Since Donald Trump took office, discussions have intensified regarding Greenland’s aspiration for independence and self-determination. The conversation, however, has largely revolved around historical grievances, as expressed by Minik Rosing, a professor of geology born in Nuuk, Greenland. He argues that while acknowledging past mistakes is essential, fostering a collective vision for the future is equally vital.
A Call for Greater Understanding
Rosing points out a critical oversight in the independence discussion: the notion of community inherent in the relationship between Greenland and Denmark. He believes that there is a disproportionate focus on the “realm” rather than the “community.” He expressed these thoughts in DR’s podcast Udsyn, emphasizing that both sides have neglected the notion of a shared community.
“In Greenland, there’s a persistent frustration regarding the assumption that Denmark knows better how people should live,” Rosing states. He envisions a future where Greenland’s unique cultural relationships are prioritized, suggesting that if Denmark and Greenland cannot agree on their mutual aspirations, it might be unwise to pursue independence.
Perceptions of Greenland’s Reality
Rosing highlights a significant disconnect between the Danish perception of Greenland and the island’s actual realities. He emphasized that many Danes may only see a one-dimensional view of Greenland shaped by stereotypes. “If you’ve only seen a plate from Venice, you might think all Italians row around in gondolas, singing ‘o sole mio’,” he quipped, illustrating how simplistic views can distort reality.
Despite recent challenges, including the controversial implementation of IUDs among thousands of Greenlandic women and debated psychological tests for child removals, Rosing insists that the narrative about Greenland must encompass both challenges and successes. He asserts, “While it is essential to address past injustices, we must also recognize the numerous positive facets of life in Greenland.”
The Process of Achieving Independence
The journey toward Greenlandic independence remains a multifaceted process, requiring the Greenlandic population to decide through a referendum. According to the Self-Government Act, any agreement made between Greenland’s government and Denmark regarding independence must be approved by both the Inatsisartut (Greenland’s Parliament) and the Danish Folketing, as laid out in Section 21, Paragraph 3 of the legislation.
This step is grounded in the principle that the Greenlandic people are the ultimate decision-makers regarding their future and underscores the necessity of involving them directly in discussions about self-determination.
Core Values of Greenland
Rosing outlines four key values that encapsulate Greenland’s identity and should guide discussions on future collaborations and independence:
1. **Free Access to Land**: In Greenland, land is not privately owned, allowing individuals to traverse the territory freely. This fundamental aspect of Greenlandic identity must be preserved, especially amid growing concerns about property ownership.
2. **Language Preservation**: The Greenlandic language is pivotal to cultural identity. Rosing stresses the importance of protecting this language, arguing that loss of language equates to loss of culture.
3. **Family Connections**: Many Greenlanders have familial ties in Denmark, making these relationships integral to the social fabric that transcends geographical boundaries. Rosing argues for solutions that maintain these familial connections, rather than forcing a choice between identities.
4. **Community Life in Rural Areas**: As Greenland’s younger population migrates to larger cities, the traditional lifestyle in smaller communities is threatened. Rosing advocates for efforts to understand and promote the unique qualities of life in these remote areas, ensuring cities can offer the same benefits and charm.
The Future of the Realm
When asked about the future of the Union of the Realm, Rosing expressed a cautious optimism. “I hope it continues because it offers numerous benefits. For it to thrive, however, there must be a commitment to ongoing development that creates joy for both countries.” He posits that progress hinges upon jointly defining the goals that both Greenland and Denmark wish to accomplish.
“This debate should center around what we want to achieve together,” Rosing adds. “If we discover that there is nothing we can agree upon, then perhaps it isn’t wise to continue as we are.”
Conclusion
The discourse surrounding Greenland’s independence reflects deep-rooted complexities, including historical injustices and modern aspirations. As Rosing emphasizes, acknowledging the past is essential, but focusing on collaborative visions for the future is equally important. By emphasizing shared values and relationships, both Greenland and Denmark could pave the way for a constructive partnership that respects the unique identities of each while promoting a sense of community and shared purpose moving forward.
Through discussions like these, informed by both the lessons of the past and the realities of the present, the potential to create a positive and equitable future for all involved remains alive and attainable.
