Military Fired at Plane They Mistook for Drone

Picture of Steven Højlund

Steven Højlund

Military Fired at Plane They Mistook for Drone

Danish military forces fired multiple shots at suspected drones over a military training area while a civilian passenger plane was in the airspace, newly released documents reveal. The Defense Ministry has not informed civil aviation authorities about the incident and continues to withhold key details about what happened during the drone panic last fall.

Shots Fired During Drone Alert

The Danish Armed Forces confirmed for the first time that soldiers fired weapons at suspected drones over Borris Training Area on September 28, 2025. The incident occurred while a Widerøe passenger plane carrying civilians was flying from Bergen to Billund Airport approximately 30 kilometers away.

Documents Reveal Military Response

DR obtained heavily redacted documents through freedom of information requests. The papers describe a special incident involving drone observations at the training facility. Soldiers fired multiple rounds of small caliber ammunition, the type used in standard military rifles, according to sources familiar with the operation.

The shooting took place between 8:19 PM and 8:51 PM. Internal reports describe an unknown drone with propellers and white and green lights moving across the military area. However, investigators found no evidence that any projectiles hit a target.

Civil Aircraft in the Area

A Widerøe turboprop aircraft was flying at an altitude over two kilometers during the shooting. An internal Defense investigation later concluded the shots posed no risk to the plane at that altitude. Nevertheless, the incident raises questions about coordination between military operations and civilian air traffic.

The airline confirmed it received no notification about the weapons discharge. Widerøe has contacted Danish authorities multiple times seeking information but has not received responses.

Aviation Authorities Kept in the Dark

Despite mandatory reporting requirements, the Danish Transport Agency never received notification about the shooting incident. This represents a potential breach of aviation safety protocols.

No Official Reports Filed

The Transport Agency must be informed of any events that could affect flight safety. Spokesperson Frederik Roed confirmed the agency received no reports about shots fired from military areas in late September. This information gap left civilian aviation operators unaware of potential risks.

The lack of communication extended beyond this single event. Documents show the Defense Ministry actively avoided flying its own aircraft over military installations during the same period. A Fennec helicopter mission was restricted, and the Home Guard canceled at least one planned flight over a military zone.

Identification Challenges

The restriction on military flights suggests personnel on the ground struggled to distinguish between friendly aircraft and potential threats. This confusion may explain why soldiers fired at what could have been a civilian plane rather than a drone. The object’s description in military reports matches characteristics of the Widerøe aircraft, including fixed wings, propellers, and navigation lights showing red, green, and white.

Denmark experienced a wave of security incidents during this period that heightened military alertness nationwide.

What Was Actually in the Sky

Military reports provide conflicting information about the suspected drone. Some documents state the object moved from south to north while others indicate north to south movement.

Descriptions Match Civilian Aircraft

Observers described a fixed wing object with propellers emitting white, green, and red lights. These characteristics align precisely with standard aircraft navigation lighting rather than typical drone configurations. The report notes a faint sound from the propeller, another feature consistent with turboprop aircraft.

The Widerøe flight path and timing correspond to the observation window. However, Defense officials have not confirmed or denied whether investigators identified the aircraft as the object soldiers fired upon.

Multiple Sightings Reported

The Borris incident was not isolated. Documents reference drone observations at Skrydstrup Air Station and Frederikshavn Naval Station between September 24 and 28. Later reports amended language from definitive drone sightings to suspected or presumed drones, indicating growing uncertainty about what personnel actually observed.

One confirmed false alarm occurred when Billund Airport closed for 20 minutes after a drone report. Investigators determined the sighting was actually a star.

Legal Authority and Consequences

Since July 1, 2025, Danish military personnel have legal authority to shoot down drones over military installations. Defense Chief Michael Wiggers Hyldgaard emphasized three days before the Borris incident that forces had clear authorization to neutralize drone threats.

Evaluation Process Remains Secret

The Defense Ministry planned to release an evaluation of the drone response in late February. Officials postponed the report without explanation, then delayed it again until after the parliamentary election. Multiple political parties expressed frustration with the continued secrecy.

Internal Defense protocols require reporting of special incidents through a five point framework covering when, what, where, how, and response actions. Further investigation may involve military police depending on circumstances. DR could not determine whether authorities opened any investigation into the Borris shooting.

No Criminal Review Initiated

The Military Audit Corps, which investigates potential criminal matters in the armed forces, confirmed it received no referral about the weapons discharge. This suggests Defense leadership did not view the incident as requiring criminal scrutiny despite the presence of civilian aircraft and uncertainty about the target.

Documents show tasks marked for immediate completion in early October related to the Borris incident. The nature of these assignments remains classified.

Pattern of Secrecy

The Defense Ministry heavily redacted documents provided to DR, citing national security concerns. Officials argued that revealing observation details could allow potential adversaries to identify weaknesses in Danish defense capabilities.

Public Safety Questions Unanswered

The redactions leave fundamental questions unresolved. Authorities have not explained what personnel actually saw, why communication failed between military and civilian aviation, or how forces will prevent similar confusion in future incidents. The public also lacks information about whether other shooting incidents occurred during the drone alert period.

Defense Chief Hyldgaard declined to comment for this article. The Defense Ministry stated the comprehensive evaluation will address the September 22 to October 6 observation period but provided no specific release date beyond after the election.

Broader Security Context

The drone incidents occurred amid heightened security concerns throughout Denmark. Authorities responded to multiple potential threats during the same weeks, creating an atmosphere of vigilance that may have influenced military decision making. However, the extent to which broader security concerns affected responses at specific installations remains unclear.

Email exchanges between Defense officials show subject lines changed from definitive drone references to suspected or presumed drones as the internal review progressed. This linguistic shift suggests growing recognition that initial assessments may have been incorrect.

A Personal Take

Military forces face genuine pressure to respond decisively to potential threats, especially after receiving clear authorization from leadership. Split second decisions in uncertain conditions are inherently difficult, and erring on the side of caution protects critical infrastructure. On the other hand, firing weapons while civilian aircraft operate nearby without coordinating with aviation authorities represents a serious lapse in safety protocols. The continued secrecy prevents learning from mistakes and undermines public confidence in security institutions when transparency matters most.

Sources and References

The Danish Dream: Denmark Under Siege: Cyberattacks Hit Hospitals, Cities
The Danish Dream: Danish Navy Frigate Circles Copenhagen Amid Drone Threats
The Danish Dream: Drones at Denmark’s Airports Spark Rise in Prepper Movement
The Danish Dream: Security in Denmark for Foreigners
DR: Midt i dronepanik skød Forsvaret adskillige gange op i luften og ville ikke flyve over egne områder

author avatar
Steven Højlund Editor in Chief
Fuel Prices Explode: What You’ll Pay Now

Get the daily top News Stories from Denmark in your inbox