Gun bans in Denmark: The Nørresundby case gap

Picture of Femi Ajakaye

Femi Ajakaye

Gun bans in Denmark: The Nørresundby case gap

A 48-year-old man who killed a 62-year-old and wounded a police officer in Nørresundby this week had already threatened two people with a loaded pistol outside a McDonald’s in 2010, using racist language, yet North Jutland police recorded just two completed homicides in all of 2023 while attempted homicides rose from six to thirteen over the same five-year period, according to Statistics Denmark.

The Nørresundby shooter’s history reads like a warning Denmark’s gun-control system was built to catch. In April 2010, outside a McDonald’s in the historic city, he pointed a loaded 7.65mm pistol at two people and called one of them “dit sorte svin,” a racist slur. At his preliminary hearing the next day he admitted to being a firearms enthusiast. He owned multiple rifles and shotguns. He received one year and three months in prison.

Sixteen years later he shot dead a neighbour at Virkelyst 12 on July 17 and injured a police officer before being subdued by special forces. In court the following day he reportedly said he wanted to end his own life and remembered little of the attack.

The case lands in a region where violent crime is shifting rather than disappearing. Across the entire North Jutland police district, which covers Nørresundby and Aalborg, only two completed homicides were registered in 2023, down from seven in 2018, according to Statistics Denmark’s StatBank table STRAFNA1. Yet attempted homicides rose from six to thirteen over exactly the same period.

Eurostat data suggest that in many countries medical advances and rapid emergency response can turn potentially lethal incidents into attempted homicides, but Danish regional statistics do not identify weapon type or cause of non-death at the district level. The shift nonetheless raises uncomfortable questions about how Denmark tracks, supervises and disarms high-risk gun owners after they serve their sentences.

Denmark’s Weapon Ban System and the Nørresundby Case

Since 2010, Danish law has tightened repeatedly. Amendments to the Weapons Act introduced broader weapon bans and longer confiscation periods for repeat offenders. After the 2015 Copenhagen terror shootings and gang-related violence, the National Police adopted an explicit zero-tolerance strategy on illegal firearms, as set out in the Politiets Våbenstrategi 2022-2025. Justice Ministry statistics indicate that the use of weapon bans under section 79 of the Weapons Act has increased substantially since the mid-2010s, though detailed annual figures are not published.

Courts can prohibit persons convicted of serious weapons or violent offences from owning firearms for a defined period, which can be long-term and, in some cases, effectively permanent, under Våbenloven section 79. The explanatory notes to the 2018 weapons amendment, Lov nr. 274 af 26. marts 2018, stress that even isolated serious gun incidents should normally trigger such a ban. The 2010 racist gun threat in a public place appears to fit the type of case those explanatory notes describe as warranting a weapon ban.

Yet there is no public information on whether a weapon ban was imposed after the 2010 conviction. If one was, how did he access firearms in 2026? If none was, why not? The court judgment from 2010 is not online and the question remains unanswered.

More Weapons Offences, Fewer Deaths

Denmark recorded around 44 intentional homicides in 2023, down from 52 in 2018 and 64 in 2013, a fall of roughly 31 percent over ten years in a population of approximately 5.9 million, according to Statistics Denmark. The national homicide rate sits at about 0.7 per 100,000 inhabitants, lower than Germany’s 0.9 and France’s 1.3, according to Eurostat’s crim_hom_off database. Any single killing therefore stands out.

Police-recorded Weapons Act offences tell a different story. According to Statistics Denmark’s StatBank, North Jutland recorded more weapons offences in 2023 than in 2015, while completed homicides fell over the same period. Nationally, Justice Ministry crime reports indicate more than 3,000 offences under the Weapons Act in 2022. There is no consensus among criminologists on whether this reflects more intensive policing, more guns in circulation, or both.

For internationals living in Denmark, the gap between low homicide numbers and rising weapons offences can create a confusing picture. According to Statistics Denmark’s FOLK1C table, around 12 to 13 percent of Aalborg’s residents are of non-Danish origin. Justice Ministry and police reports highlight gun crime in gang environments, rural weapons hoarding and domestic disputes, issues that may not feature in internationals’ common perceptions of cities like Aalborg.

Health, Privacy and Police Power

Danish law requires health professionals to notify authorities if a patient is deemed unfit to possess weapons, as set out in the Health Act and associated guidance. Police can then revoke licences and confiscate firearms. But the system depends on information flow from doctors and on the individual having registered weapons in the first place.

The Danish Police Federation has previously stated in parliamentary hearings on weapons legislation that persons with weapon bans can still obtain firearms, underlining the need for stronger enforcement and inter-agency cooperation. Mental-health advocates, including the Danish Psychiatric Association, have cautioned that over-reporting patients as dangerous may deter people from seeking psychiatric help. National hunting licence figures suggest high licence rates among adult men in some rural North Jutland municipalities, underlining hunting’s cultural importance in the region.

Recent Justice Ministry consultation papers discuss expanding police powers to search and seize weapons in cases involving prior violent convictions. Defence lawyers and civil-liberties groups have argued in Justice Committee submissions that lowering the threshold for such searches could disproportionately affect minority communities and law-abiding hunters.

What Internationals Can Do

For internationals worried after a high-profile shooting, the emergency number is 112. Operators speak English and dispatch police, ambulance and fire. Non-urgent concerns, such as a neighbour who appears to stockpile weapons or make violent threats, can be reported via the local police non-emergency number 114 or online tip forms on the district police website. Anonymous reports are accepted.

If someone appears suicidal or mentally unstable and possibly dangerous, relatives or neighbours can encourage contact with a GP or psychiatric emergency services. In urgent mental-health crises, citizens can also call the regional mental-health hotline. Once a person holds a CPR number and yellow health card, they have full access to public mental-health services.

Expats who own firearms for hunting or sport must obtain the same licences as Danes and are subject to the same bans and checks. English-language guidance is available through International Citizen Service offices, including in Aalborg, and local police licensing offices. Municipal crisis counselling is often made available after serious incidents. Internationals can ask their municipality’s Borgerservice or local health centre about English-language support.

Denmark has a relatively strict gun-control regime by European standards, with tight licensing and penalties for illegal weapons. But this Nørresundby case highlights possible gaps that critics worry about: between conviction and long-term supervision, between legal ownership and illegal access, and between low national homicide numbers and signs of increased serious violence in some regions. One weapon in the wrong hands can still be catastrophic, especially when those hands have been documented for 16 years.

author avatar
Femi Ajakaye Editor in Chief
The Danish Dream

Get the daily top News Stories from Denmark in your inbox